← Sinan Lab › Models › Octo
UC Berkeley RAIL et al.

Octo

93M Commercial use OK 8/8 verified

Facts

Released
2024-05 1 Source
Parameters
0.093 B 1 Source
Architecture
Transformer policy 0 Source
License
MIT (tagged on code and weights repositories) 2 Source
Commercial
Commercial use OK 0 Source
Weights
huggingface.co ↗ 1 Source
Code
github.com ↗ 1 Source
Paper
arxiv.org ↗ 0 Source
Input modalities
rgb · language · goal_image 0 Source
Action space
End-effector pose delta + gripper (diffusion) 0 Source
Cross-embodiment
Pretrained on approx. 800k Open X-Embodiment trajectories 1 Source
Pretraining data (hours)
Unverified 0 Source
Target forms
Single arm 0 Source
Architecture · Transformer backbone + diffusion action head; octo-base 93M, octo-small 27M
Sources · 2 sources
params_b,license,code_url,cross_embodiment https://github.com/octo-models/octo Official page · Fetched 2026-09-04 · No snapshot stored yet README:Octo-Base 93M Params / Octo-Small 27M;License: MIT;800k robot trajectories from Open X-Embodiment
weights_url,license,release_date https://huggingface.co/api/models/rail-berkeley/octo-base-1.5 Model hub page · Fetched 2026-09-04 · No snapshot stored yet Model card license: mit; createdAt 2024-05-21

Activity signals

Public counters fetched daily from GitHub, Hugging Face and ModelScope. Numbers only; no judgement. · fetched 2026-10-18

GitHub stars
1,807
+28 / 30 d
Commits · 90 d
0
last push 810 d ago
HF downloads · 30 d
208
all-time 3,147 · 18 likes
Weights last modified
2024-05-21
881 d ago
GitHubocto-models/octo · 282 forks · 97 open issues · latest release v1.5 (2024-05-24)no push for 809 d
ModelScopeno same-name mirror found (searched by repo name)
stars · last 30 d

Public benchmark scores

As printed in the source; protocols differ between papers. Full table with notes on the benchmarks page.

BenchmarkSubsetScoreSource
LIBEROOcto-Baseavg75.1third-party · OpenVLA paper, Table 12, row 'Octo fine-tuned', Average (75.1 ± 0.6%)
LIBEROOcto-Basegoal84.6third-party · OpenVLA paper, Table 12, row 'Octo fine-tuned', LIBERO-Goal (84.6 ± 0.9%)
LIBEROOcto-Baselong51.1third-party · OpenVLA paper, Table 12, row 'Octo fine-tuned', LIBERO-Long (51.1 ± 1.3%)
LIBEROOcto-Baseobject85.7third-party · OpenVLA paper, Table 12, row 'Octo fine-tuned', LIBERO-Object (85.7 ± 0.9%)
LIBEROOcto-Basespatial78.9third-party · OpenVLA paper, Table 12, row 'Octo fine-tuned', LIBERO-Spatial (78.9 ± 1.0%)
Real-robot evaluation (self-reported)Octo-Basefinetuning_6_domains_avg72paper · Table I (fine-tuning results), row 'Octo', Average
SimplerEnv · Google RobotOcto-Basevariant_aggregation1.2third-party · CogACT paper, Table 1 (Variant Aggregation), row 'Octo-Base', Average
SimplerEnv · Google RobotOcto-Basevisual_matching11third-party · CogACT paper, Table 1 (Visual Matching), row 'Octo-Base', Average
SimplerEnv · WidowX (Bridge)Octo-Basevisual_matching17.5third-party · CogACT paper, Table 2 (WidowX), row 'Octo-Base', Average
SimplerEnv · WidowX (Bridge)Octo-Smallvisual_matching26.7third-party · CogACT paper, Table 2 (WidowX), row 'Octo-Small', Average
All benchmarks →

Deployment recipe

No recipe yet. We publish only steps that actually ran on a rented GPU with a measured latency; this model has not been through that yet.

Record history

2026-09-04
Sources fetched
params_b,license,code_url,cross_embodiment · weights_url,license,release_date

Latency & cost

cost = p50 ms ÷ 1000 × rental ÷ 3600 × 1000
Hardwarep50 msp95 msPeak VRAMCost per 1k inferences ¥samples
NVIDIA RTX 4090
¥1.68/h · GongJi Compute (2026)
— — — — no latency data No data
NVIDIA RTX 5090
¥2.4/h · Runyun 2.4 / GongJi 2.5 / Paratera Cloud 2.98 (2026)
— — — — no latency data No data
NVIDIA A100 80GB
no rental price
— — — — no latency data No data
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Thor
no rental price
— — — — no latency data No data
NVIDIA H100 80GB
no rental price
— — — — no latency data No data
NVIDIA A800 80GB
no rental price
— — — — no latency data No data
No latency measurements for this model yet · Data comes from literature, maintainer runs, or crowd CLI uploads. None exist so far.

Compatibility

Colored only where we hold evidence. An amber dot means the vendor declares this form as a target; that is a claim, not a verified compatibility.

Unitree G1Unitree H1AgiBot Genie G1AgileX Piper armSO-101Franka FR3 / PandaFourier GR-2WidowX 250 SGoogle Robot(Everyday Robots)ALOHA 2 / Cobot Magic (dual-arm)Galaxea R1 ProFranka Emika Panda
Octo
Legend Officially supportedCommunity reproducedFine-tunable in theoryUnsupportedUnknown Vendor-declared target form 4 / 12 cells with a definite status

Reproduction records

Did this model run on your robot? Report it with a link (log, video or repo). Records are reviewed by the maintainers; a verified “works” or “works after fine-tuning” upgrades the matrix cell to “community verified” with your link as evidence. Anonymous is fine; nothing but the fields below is stored.

No verified record yet for this model.

SinanLab · Sinan LabClear direction, grounded judgement.